Text Size   Decrease Font SizeIncrease Font Size
int_slide_copy

Lessons from Tressel

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Friday, 10 June 2011 20:51

The saga surrounding Jim Tressel, Terrelle Pryor, and the Ohio State University (“OSU”) brings to mind several important points.  Often times, coaches on college campuses look at NCAA compliance officers as the police and NCAA compliance in general as a burden.  Most NCAA compliance officers cringe at the thought of being called the police, but the stigma remains.  NCAA compliance is the necessary evil to balance the playing field, thus coaches are required to be cognizant of the rules and abide by them.  

With all of the technology and media coverage, it is extremely difficult to hide an NCAA infraction for long.  There is always a disgruntled former student-athlete, booster, or employee that will spill the beans when asked.  Really, there are two ways for a coach to lose his/her job.  Of course, a coach is asked to be successful on the playing field, but it is NCAA infractions that will take down the best of all coaches.  Six months ago, most would say Jim Tressel was one of the most highly regarded coaches, if not the most, currently involved in intercollegiate athletics.  However, he broke the cardinal rule.  The integrity of the institution (and program) has to come before a single member of a team.

The scandal at OSU is nothing new.  Every school around the country has a student-athlete who receives preferential treatment because he/she participates on a team.  Compare OSU’s scandal to the University of Oklahoma’s major infractions case involving starting quarterback, Rhett Bomar.  Bomar accepted money for work he did not perform.  Coach Stoops and Coach Tressel were probably equally known for their integrity and are loved by a mass of supporters.  I do not recall anyone calling for Coach Stoops’ job.  Why? The answer is simple; he dismissed Bomar without hesitation.  Student-athletes are educated on the rules and know right from wrong.  No amount of education or monitoring will stop some student-athletes from violating rules.  However, coaches have to be above the fray and set a positive example.  If coaches fail to abide by the rules, the cost will be a hard earned reputation and an eight figure contract.  When in doubt, a coach must ask the compliance staff for help and remove himself/herself from the investigation.  If a coach fails to do so, the next call should be to legal counsel to start working on a buyout.  It is not worth it. 

For any questions, feel free to contact Christian Dennie at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

Recent News

Judd Pritchard Selected as 40 Under 40

Judd Pritchard has been selected as a member of the Fort Worth Business Press's 2012 class of 40 Under 40.   As stated by the ...

[Read More]

Zach Garsek Graduates from Leadership Fort Worth

Zach Garsek recently completed the Leadership Fort Worth Leadership Class, graduating with a class that includes many up and coming community leaders from diverse backgrounds ...

[Read More]

Recent Publications

Strict Penalties for Violators? Do NCAA Policies Work?, Legal Issues in Collegiate Athletics Vol. 12, Issue 4 (Feb. 2011); also published J. of NCAA Compliance (Jan.-Feb. 2011)

Eviction Appeals - Second Time's the Charm, ROOFLINES (December 2010)

[View All Publications]

Contact Us

Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
3815 Lisbon Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Phone: 817.731.4500
Fax: 817.731.6200

©2010 - 2011 Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
Disclaimer
Law Firm Web Design by The Modern Firm