Text Size   Decrease Font SizeIncrease Font Size
int_slide_copy

College Sports Law Blog



The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of California, Los Angeles

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Friday, 23 September 2016 20:14

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that University of California, Los Angeles (“UCLA” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The Panel considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agree to the primary facts, violations and violation levels as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (“SDR”). Because the Institution agreed to the violations and penalties, there is no opportunity to appeal.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of California, Los Angeles]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Stanford University

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Monday, 19 September 2016 21:20

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that Stanford University (“SU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The Panel considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agree to the primary facts, violations and violation levels as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (“SDR”). Because the Institution agreed to the violations and penalties, there is no opportunity to appeal.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Stanford University]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Campbell University

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Tuesday, 30 August 2016 19:15

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that Campbell University (“CU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The Panel considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agree to the primary facts, violations and violation levels as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (“SDR”). Because the Institution agreed to the violations and penalties, there is no opportunity to appeal.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Campbell University]
 

Jenkins v. NCAA: Judge Wilken Denies the NCAA’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Tuesday, 09 August 2016 20:40

On August 5, 2016, in  Jenkins v. NCAA, Judge Claudia Wilken (also the judge in O’Bannon v. NCAA) entered an order denying the NCAA’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In Jenkins, the plaintiffs argue there are “restrictions on the compensation of student-athletes for their athletic performance.”  Relying on the Ninth Circuit’s language in O’Bannon that “compensation” must be “tethered to academics,” the NCAA moved for judgment on the pleadings in accordance with 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by arguing that “offering [student-athletes] cash sum untethered to education expenses was not a less restrictive alternative to the NCAA’s current rules under the rule of reason."

Read more... [Jenkins v. NCAA: Judge Wilken Denies the NCAA’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Missouri

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Tuesday, 02 August 2016 20:10

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that the University of Missouri (“MU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. A representative of the Institution's athletics interests had impermissible recruiting contacts with a men's basketball prospective student-athlete and provided impermissible inducements and extra benefits to other men's basketball student-athletes. Additionally, a different representative of the Institution's athletics interests provided impermissible benefits to men's basketball student-athletes when he provided discounted room rates at a resort to student-athletes and provided free meals to three members of one student-athlete’s family. The Institution also failed to monitor the men's basketball program. As a result, several men's basketball student-athletes competed while ineligible during the 2013-14 season. The Panel considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agree to the primary facts, violations and violation levels as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (“SDR”). Because the Institution agreed to the violations and penalties, there is no opportunity to appeal.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Missouri]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Georgia Southern University

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Friday, 08 July 2016 17:04

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that Georgia Southern University (“GSU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. This case involved two academic violations at GSU. Both violations involved former institutional staff members who were expected to fulfill a role, at least in part, in ensuring academic integrity surrounding student-athletes. This case originated as a Summary Disposition Report (“SDR”). After consideration, however, the Panel rejected the SDR to further consider application of NCAA Bylaw 10 to the agreed-upon conduct. In this case, the Panel encountered the narrow interpretation in which the NCAA's legislative and charging bodies have taken with respect to analyzing academic misconduct violations. The Panel was also presented with a limited record in this case. Based on those factors, the Panel concluded that the institutional staff members provided impermissible academic assistance rather than having committed academic misconduct. All participating parties agreed violations were Level I, and the Panel concludes the same.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Georgia Southern University]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Jackson State University

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Thursday, 07 July 2016 20:28

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that Jackson State University (“JSU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. This case involved Jackson State University and its former head men's tennis coach. The Panel considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agreed to the primary facts and violations, as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (SDR).  The panel proposed further penalties to the institution and the former head men's tennis coach. Because they both agreed to the violations and penalties, there is no opportunity to appeal.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Jackson State University]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Norfolk State University

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Thursday, 07 July 2016 20:10

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Norfolk State University

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that Norfolk State University (“NSU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The institution failed to correctly apply NCAA progress-toward-degree legislation over four academic years. As a result, the institution allowed 48 student-athletes in multiple sports to compete and receive travel expenses related to competition while ineligible. The Panel considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agreed to the primary facts and violations, as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (SDR).

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Norfolk State University]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Arkansas State University (2016)

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Wednesday, 25 May 2016 20:01

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that the Arkansas State University (“ASU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The Panel considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agreed to the primary facts and violations, as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (SDR).

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Arkansas State University (2016)]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Samford University (2016)

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Monday, 16 May 2016 17:24

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that the Samford University (“SU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The Panel considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agreed to the primary facts and violations, as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (SDR).  The Committee found that SU committed the following violations of NCAA legislation:

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Samford University (2016)]
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 2 of 38

Recent News

Three BGS Lawyers Named in The Best Lawyers in America 2017

Elliott Garsek (Banking and Finance Law, Closely Held Companies and Family Businesses Law, and Litigation - Banking and Finance),  Zach Garsek (Real Estate), and Ben Barlow ...

[Read More]

Judd Pritchard Plays Host to Hogan Award Finalists

Judd Pritchard, in his role as a member of the Hogan Award Committee, plays host to the three finalists for the Hogan Award (http://thebenhoganaward.org/), which ...

[Read More]
 

Contact Us

Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
920 Foch Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Phone: 817.731.4500
Fax: 817.731.6200

©2015 Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
Disclaimer
Law Firm Web Design by The Modern Firm