Text Size   Decrease Font SizeIncrease Font Size
int_slide_copy

College Sports Law Blog



The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Southern Mississippi (2016)

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Thursday, 14 April 2016 17:57

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel” or “COI”) recently issued its findings and found that the University of Southern Mississippi (“USM” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. It centers on the head coach and members of his coaching staff engaging in a plan of academic fraud designed to assist two-year college prospective student-athletes in attaining admission to the institution and eligibility to compete. Within six weeks of becoming employed at the institution, the head coach directed one of his assistant coaches and two graduate assistant managers to complete online academic coursework for the prospects. Other members of the staff were aware of the fraud and the associate head coach helped facilitate it. The staff members eventually completed online coursework for seven prospects over two academic years. Once the staff members completed the work, either they or the prospects submitted it for credit. A majority of the prospects used the credits to attain immediate eligibility for competition upon their transfer to the institution. The head coach violated NCAA ethical conduct, cooperation and head coach responsibility legislation when he planned and directed the academic fraud. One of the institutional coaches and one of the graduate assistant managers involved in the academic fraud declined to submit to interviews or otherwise cooperate in the investigation.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Southern Mississippi (2016)]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Central State University (Division II)

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Friday, 08 April 2016 17:45

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee,” “Panel,” or “COI”) recently issued its findings and found that Central State University (“CSU” or “Institution”) committed major violations of NCAA legislation. The Committee considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agree to the primary facts and violations as fully set forth in the Summary Disposition Report (“SDR”). The case involved amateurism, eligibility, financial aid and playing and practice season violations stemming from the institution's lack of control.  The institution agreed that from the 2010-11 through the 2014-15 academic years, it failed to exercise appropriate control over the administration of its athletics program. Because of its overall failure, the institution agreed that it permitted additional major and secondary violations to occur. Those violations further demonstrate the institution's overall lack of control, a major violation.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Central State University (Division II)]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: West Texas A&M University (Division II)

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Thursday, 31 March 2016 17:44

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee,” “Panel,” or “COI”) recently issued its findings and found that West Texas A&M University (“WAMU” or “Institution”) committed major violations of NCAA legislation. The Committee considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agree to the primary facts and violations as fully set forth in the Summary Disposition Report (“SDR”). It centered on members of the football coaching staff providing impermissible benefits to prospective and enrolled student-athletes and providing false information about the violations. The case also involved two student-athletes who engaged in academic fraud and the failure of a football coach to report the fraud once he became aware of it. Because the institution and one of the involved individuals agreed to the violations and penalties, they have no opportunity to appeal. Two other involved individuals contested the committee's proposed additional penalties concerning them at expedited penalty hearings. Those two individuals have opportunities to appeal the contested penalties to the NCAA Division II Infractions Appeals Committee.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: West Texas A&M University (Division II)]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Southeast Missouri State University

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:14

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel” or “COI”) recently issued its findings and found that Southeast Missouri State University (“SEMO” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The case also included a former assistant women's basketball coach. A panel of the committee considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agreed to the primary facts and violations set forth in the summary disposition report ("SDR"). The panel agreed with the violations comprising the case but proposed further penalties for the institution and the former assistant women's basketball coach. The institution and the former assistant women's basketball coach agreed to the additional penalties.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Southeast Missouri State University]
 

Deppe v. NCAA: Antitrust Lawsuit Seeking Removal of Cap on Football Scholarships and Removal of Transfer Restrictions

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Friday, 25 March 2016 16:03

Peter Deppe (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) filed suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (hereinafter “NCAA” or “Defendant”) under Section 1 of the Sherman. The suit was filed on March 8, 2016 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The suit also seeks certification as a class action.

Read more... [Deppe v. NCAA: Antitrust Lawsuit Seeking Removal of Cap on Football Scholarships and Removal of Transfer Restrictions]
 

Metcalf v. University of North Carolina: Dismissed

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Monday, 22 February 2016 22:18

Several University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (“UNC”) student-athletes filed suit against UNC alleging they were coerced into taking “shadow curriculum” based on bogus classes. Additionally, the student-athletes argued they were blocked from receiving the education they were promised because coaches and administrators funneled them into “sham” courses offered by the Department of African, African American, and Diaspora Studies.  UNC argued the case lacked merit and, further, argued UNC is immune from suit and the limitations period closed years ago.  Ultimately, Superior Court Judge Robert Ervin agreed and dismissed the case.

Read more... [Metcalf v. University of North Carolina: Dismissed]
 

Berger v. NCAA: Motion to Dismiss Granted

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Monday, 22 February 2016 21:38

The three plaintiffs in this matter were one time members of the women’s track and field team at the University of Pennsylvania (“Penn”).  The plaintiffs argue they are employees of Penn for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and, thus, they are entitled under the wage-and-hour provisions of the FLSA to be paid at least minimum wage for the work they perform as student-athletes. The plaintiffs sued the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) and 123 NCAA member institutions that field Division I athletic teams.

Read more... [Berger v. NCAA: Motion to Dismiss Granted]
 

Penn Law Sports Law Symposium

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Tuesday, 09 February 2016 22:36

On February 19, 2016, the Penn Law Entertainment and Sports Law Society is hosting its 3rd Annual Sports Law Symposium.  To register click on the following link:

Read more... [Penn Law Sports Law Symposium]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Louisiana, Lafayette

Print
Friday, 15 January 2016 20:46

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel” or “COI”) recently issued its findings and found that the University of Louisiana, Lafayette (“ULL” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. This case initially arose out of a different investigation at another member institution. The NCAA enforcement staff interviewed a football student-athlete who had transferred to ULL and an assistant football coach. Both of these individuals became central figures in this case. The interviews ultimately led to an NCAA investigation of the ULL football program centered on possible entrance exam fraud committed by a former assistant football coach and several enrolled football student-athletes.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Louisiana, Lafayette]
 

Missouri House Bill No. 1743

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Thursday, 31 December 2015 20:45

The University of Missouri’s football student-athletes banded together for a cause they believed to be important and indicated if certain administrators chose not to step down, the student-athletes would not play football. Quickly, administrators resigned or indicated they would later resign. The Missouri legislature responded with House Bill No. 1743 (“Bill”). In pertinent part, the Bill states:

Read more... [Missouri House Bill No. 1743]
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 2 of 37

Recent News

Three BGS Lawyers Named in The Best Lawyers in America 2017

Elliott Garsek (Banking and Finance Law, Closely Held Companies and Family Businesses Law, and Litigation - Banking and Finance),  Zach Garsek (Real Estate), and Ben Barlow ...

[Read More]

Judd Pritchard Plays Host to Hogan Award Finalists

Judd Pritchard, in his role as a member of the Hogan Award Committee, plays host to the three finalists for the Hogan Award (http://thebenhoganaward.org/), which ...

[Read More]
 

Contact Us

Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
920 Foch Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Phone: 817.731.4500
Fax: 817.731.6200

©2015 Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
Disclaimer
Law Firm Web Design by The Modern Firm