Text Size   Decrease Font SizeIncrease Font Size
int_slide_copy

College Sports Law Blog



The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Louisiana, Lafayette

Print
Friday, 15 January 2016 20:46

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel” or “COI”) recently issued its findings and found that the University of Louisiana, Lafayette (“ULL” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. This case initially arose out of a different investigation at another member institution. The NCAA enforcement staff interviewed a football student-athlete who had transferred to ULL and an assistant football coach. Both of these individuals became central figures in this case. The interviews ultimately led to an NCAA investigation of the ULL football program centered on possible entrance exam fraud committed by a former assistant football coach and several enrolled football student-athletes.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Louisiana, Lafayette]
 

Missouri House Bill No. 1743

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Thursday, 31 December 2015 20:45

The University of Missouri’s football student-athletes banded together for a cause they believed to be important and indicated if certain administrators chose not to step down, the student-athletes would not play football. Quickly, administrators resigned or indicated they would later resign. The Missouri legislature responded with House Bill No. 1743 (“Bill”). In pertinent part, the Bill states:

Read more... [Missouri House Bill No. 1743]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Hawaii, Manoa

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Wednesday, 30 December 2015 22:07

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that the University of Hawaii, Manoa (“UH” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: University of Hawaii, Manoa]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Florida A&M University

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Tuesday, 29 December 2015 19:01

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that Florida A&M University (“FAMU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The Committee considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agreed to the primary facts and violations, as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (“SDR”).

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Florida A&M University]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Indiana University – Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Tuesday, 29 December 2015 18:43

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that Indiana University – Purdue University, Fort Wayne (“IUPU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The Committee considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agreed to the primary facts and violations, as fully set forth in the summary disposition report ("SDR").

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Indiana University – Purdue University, Fort Wayne]
 

NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee: Syracuse University (Boeheim Appeal)

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Friday, 04 December 2015 20:41

On March 6, 2015, the Committee on Infractions (“COI”) issued its decision involving infractions committed by Syracuse University (“Syracuse” or “Institution”), in which the COI found violations of NCAA legislation in the men’s basketball and football programs. On the basis of those findings, COI determined that this was a major infractions case and imposed penalties accordingly. Jim Boeheim (“Head Coach” or “Boeheim”) appealed COI’s findings and penalties as they related to him.

Read more... [NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee: Syracuse University (Boeheim Appeal)]
 

NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee: Syracuse University

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Wednesday, 25 November 2015 19:53

On March 6, 2015, the Committee on Infractions (“COI”) issued its decision involving infractions committed by Syracuse University (“Syracuse” or “Institution”), in which the COI found violations of NCAA legislation in the men’s basketball and football programs. On the basis of those findings, COI determined that this was a major infractions case and imposed penalties accordingly.

Read more... [NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee: Syracuse University]
 

Pugh v. NCAA: Antitrust Lawsuit Seeking Multi-Year Scholarships, Uncapped Number of Football Scholarships, and Removal of Transfer Restrictions

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Tuesday, 17 November 2015 16:51

Devin Pugh (hereinafter “Devin” or “Plaintiff”) filed suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (hereinafter “NCAA” or “Defendant”) under Section 1 of the Sherman. The suit was filed on November 5, 2015 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Devin seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. The suit also seeks certification as a class action.

Read more... [Pugh v. NCAA: Antitrust Lawsuit Seeking Multi-Year Scholarships, Uncapped Number of Football Scholarships, and Removal of Transfer Restrictions]
 

The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: California State University, Sacramento

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Friday, 13 November 2015 22:24

The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “Panel”) recently issued its findings and found that California State University, Sacramento (“CSU” or “Institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. The Committee considered this case through the cooperative summary disposition process in which all parties agreed to the primary facts and violations, as fully set forth in the summary disposition report (SDR). The panel then proposed further penalties to the institution, the former assistant football coach and the former head coach. All three parties agreed to the panel's proposed penalties; therefore, there is no opportunity to appeal.

Read more... [The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: California State University, Sacramento]
 

O’Bannon v. NCAA: Ninth Circuit Decision Affirming in Part and Vacating in Part

Print
Written by Christian Dennie   
Tuesday, 06 October 2015 16:21

After six years of litigation, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion affirming in part and vacating in part the District Court’s decision in O’Bannon v. NCAA. The long-awaited decision likely puts an end to the most volatile litigation in the history of the NCAA and allows for the current structure of the NCAA to stay largely intact. Yet, the decision also allows future plaintiffs some opening and arguments against the NCAA’s revered notions of amateurism. Analysis of the District Court’s decision can be found here.

Read more... [O’Bannon v. NCAA: Ninth Circuit Decision Affirming in Part and Vacating in Part]
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 2 of 36

Recent News

Judd Pritchard Discusses Battling Voter Apathy

On April 27, 2016, Judd Pritchard spoke as a part of a webinar titled Battling Voter Apathy.  The presentation was presented by the North Texas Commission.  ...

[Read More]

Christian Dennie Speaks at the 3rd Annual Sports & Entertainment Law Symposium at Texas A&M Law Scho

On April 26, 2016, Christian Dennie served as a panelist and speaker at the Third Annual Sports and Entertainment Law Symposium hosted by Texas A&M Law ...

[Read More]
 

Contact Us

Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
920 Foch Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Phone: 817.731.4500
Fax: 817.731.6200

©2015 Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
Disclaimer
Law Firm Web Design by The Modern Firm